Hello

Your subscription is almost coming to an end. Don’t miss out on the great content on Nation.Africa

Ready to continue your informative journey with us?

Hello

Your premium access has ended, but the best of Nation.Africa is still within reach. Renew now to unlock exclusive stories and in-depth features.

Reclaim your full access. Click below to renew.

Why columnists need to root their opinion in fact or strong evidence

William Ruto

Deputy President William Ruto and other politicians allied to United Democratic Alliance address a press conference at his Karen official residence on August 5, 2021. Readers have expressed mixed feelings about columnist Makau Mutua’s opinion on the DP.

Photo credit: File | Nation Media Group

What you need to know:

  • Opinion that is not rooted in facts and evidence is worthless.
  • It’s mere assertions, speculation, rumour mongering, gossip.

I am disappointed with you today, says a reader following my piece last Friday on how to evaluate Prof Makau Mutua’s criticism of Deputy President William Ruto. 

“Prof Makau [Mutua] has every right to speak about governance, his expressions notwithstanding. He is a darling to many and those who feel offended shouldn’t read his column. More so, those who are aggressive (sic) should seek redress from the court. You better not be their advocate.”