Hello

Your subscription is almost coming to an end. Don’t miss out on the great content on Nation.Africa

Ready to continue your informative journey with us?

Hello

Your premium access has ended, but the best of Nation.Africa is still within reach. Renew now to unlock exclusive stories and in-depth features.

Reclaim your full access. Click below to renew.

Why journalists ‘name and shame’ wrongdoers in frontpage headlines

Journalists

Journalists covering a press conference in Nairobi on July 27, 2021.

Photo credit: Lucy Wanjiru | Nation Media Group

What you need to know:

  • The most impactful type of shaming is when a newspaper makes the shaming part and parcel of the story.
  • It is necessary to add context to a story that makes shaming its logical conclusion.

Journalists usually play the role of a neutral observer and describer of facts and events. Occasionally, however, they pass judgment in what’s called interpretive journalism. One of the ways they do this is to “name and shame” persons or organisations involved in wrongdoing.

Let’s say a fight breaks out in a church. It’s normally sufficient for a journalist to narrate what happened and let readers decide whether it is shameful or not. But in interpretive journalism, the journalist decides for the reader.