Elections are an expensive affair. They entail deep emotional toil.
One would, therefore, be inhumane if he or she does not sympathise with Raila Odinga ’s constant electoral losses.
He carries the aspirations of a huge chunk of Kenyans. Thus one needs to ask the question: what makes Raila constantly lose elections in Kenya?
A disclaimer is important here. No school offers foolproof lessons on how to win presidential elections.
Otherwise, every ambitious politician would have enrolled in such a school.
What this article attempts to do is to give tips on why Raila has consistently lost five presidential elections, based on an analysis of his political journey.
Those tips maybe erroneous and biased, but they can be deemed as speaking to some reality that can help budding aspirants.
The first factor has been Raila's penchant for predicating his politics on false political assumptions.
An assumption means 'a thing that is accepted as true or as certain to happen, without proof’.
In every election, a candidate has to have certain truthful political assumptions. Raila’s mistake has been making false political assumptions.
In 2005, Raila defeated the government in a referendum on a constitutional draft.
He then made a false assumption that the win automatically provided the impetus that was needed for a win in the 2007 presidential elections.
He also failed to factor in the impact of the regrouping of government forces after the referendum loss in the period between 2005 and 2007.
In 2013, he assumed William Ruto and Uhuru Kenyatta would not be cleared to vie due to their cases at the International Criminal Court in the Hague, or, if they would vie, he assumed their reputations would be so battered that they would not win.
He failed to factor in the reverse logic – the two would leverage on the cases and play the victim card.
In 2017, his run was based on the false assumption that the government was unpopular. Of course, the opposite is true.
First, the main ethnic groups that had supported it in the first instance often rally behind it for the second time on the basis of 'siege mentality'.
Siege mentality in this case refers to the need to protect the ethnic groups that form the government from external threats. This explains the huge turnout by the Kalenjin and the Kikuyu in 2017.
Second, small ethnic groups will always rally behind a political coalition that appears to be the 'government'.
That explains Raila’s bigger loss in 2017, after huge swings towards Jubilee by the Samburu, Borana, Kisii and Somali communities.
This factor explains the current stampede by Somali MPs and leaders towards the victorious Kenya Kwanza Alliance.
In 2022, Raila made one fatal political assumption. He assumed Uhuru would help him win by swaying to his side Mt Kenya and government bureaucracy, read ‘Deep State’.
Raila failed to take into account the fact that Uhuru would only have helped him if he (Uhuru) was seeking re-election.
However, a politician vacating office cannot donate a political constituency unless he or she wields monarchical powers.
In political transitions, rational government bureaucracies have every incentive to act neutral to avoid vengeance in case political plans go the opposite direction.
Compare this to Ruto’s political assumptions. In 2013 and 2017, Uhuru publicly endorsed Ruto for 2022.
Ruto wisely saw this as a false political assumption. He worked on the reverse logic. He went to the Mt Kenya region directly. He is now the President-elect.
Moi had to act as the timid deputy to succeed Kenyatta I. Through Kenyatta, Moi attained the presidency.
Kibaki acted as Moi's meek deputy for many years. Uhuru had to convert himself into a staunch Kibaki defender between 2007 and 2013 for him to win.
Ruto became Uhuru's 'mtu wa mkono' (handyman) between 2013 and 2018 and an oppressed meek servant between 2018 and 2022 in order to win in 2022.
Raila tried this trick through ‘Handshake’ but, unfortunately, Uhuru was a retiring King with no constituency to donate to.
In the bible, persons who became great prophets never jumped at opportunities in the first instance despite beckoning by God himself.
God called Jonah to preach to the people of Ninevah. The scripture says, "But Jonah ran away from the Lord and headed for Tarshish (Spain).
When God appeared to Moses and told him his mission, Moses said, "Who am I that I should go to Pharaoh and bring the Israelites out of Egypt?"
His response? "But Lord, how can I save Israel? My clan is the weakest in Manasseh and I am the least in my family."
Jeremiah was another reluctant prophet. God said to him, "I have appointed you as a prophet to the nations."
Jeremiah's response was similar to all the other ones: "Ah, Sovereign Lord, I do not know how to speak; I am only a child."
The lesson that Raila should have learnt from these stories, is simple. He should not seek to win the presidency directly.
The more he seeks, the more he fails.
