Hello

Your subscription is almost coming to an end. Don’t miss out on the great content on Nation.Africa

Ready to continue your informative journey with us?

Hello

Your premium access has ended, but the best of Nation.Africa is still within reach. Renew now to unlock exclusive stories and in-depth features.

Reclaim your full access. Click below to renew.

Why petrol import deal isn’t risk-free as touted

Fuel pump

A fuel attendant holding a fuel pump at the filling station along Kimathi Street. Kenya is planning to pull out of the G-to-G deal oil programme in December this year.


Photo credit:  Jeff Angote | Nation Media Group

The International Monetary Fund has estimated the taxpayer’s exposure to the fuel import scheme at around $400 million (Sh64.7 billion), which means the government-to-government (G-to-G) deal is not risk-free as touted.

It estimates the State's contingent liabilities stemming from the letters of support issued to participants in the supply chain at 0.4 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP), or Sh64.6 billion.

“A reasonable estimate of the government contingent liabilities stemming from the new fuel import scheme is around 10 per cent of the maximum private sector obligation to fuel exporters or around $400 million (0.4 per cent of GDP),” said the IMF in the latest country report under the Extended Fund Facility (EFF) and Extended Credit Facility (ECF) Arrangements. A contingent liability is a potential loss that may occur in the future depending on the outcome of a specific event.

In the case of the G-to-G mechanism launched in April 2023 the IMF says taxpayers are exposed to calls on the national budget in case prices at the pump are not adjusted to fully pass through any forex losses to the final consumers.

To hedge against foreign exchange (FX) losses, Kenya opened an interest-bearing escrow account into which the proceeds from the sale of fuel under this deal are packed. The interest on the funds is the 91-day Treasury Bill rate minus 200 basis points (two percentage points).

The interest is paid to a government led stabilisation account to mitigate forex losses.

The IMF staff and the Attorney General of Kenya reviewed the legal arrangements of the fuel import scheme establishing that they do not give rise to State guarantees of private debt under domestic law as defined in the Technical Memorandum of Understanding under the IMF-supported EFF/ECF arrangements.

“The government is, nevertheless, exposed to calls on the national budget in case prices at the pump are not adjusted to fully pass through any FX valuation losses under the mechanism to final consumers,” said the IMF.

“It may further have to raise US dollar financing to cover any shortfalls of FX, needed to repay exporters, in the domestic market,” added the IMF.

The Kenyan Government has already indicated its intention to pull out of the scheme in December and leave it to the private players.

The scheme, which had an initial duration of nine months and extended for another 12 months to end-2024, includes the issuance of letters of support by the government to domestic oil marketing companies (OMCs) that also benefit the banks, financial institutions, credit insurance providers, lenders and any hedging counterparties providing financing, insurance, refinancing or hedging to the OMCs.

The fuel is imported on six-month credit, backed by commercial letters of credit issued by domestic banks and confirmed by international banks. Banks are cagey on continuing to issue letters of credit without the letters of support from the government.