Hello

Your subscription is almost coming to an end. Don’t miss out on the great content on Nation.Africa

Ready to continue your informative journey with us?

Hello

Your premium access has ended, but the best of Nation.Africa is still within reach. Renew now to unlock exclusive stories and in-depth features.

Reclaim your full access. Click below to renew.

Court suspends orders against Mwilu ahead of hearing in Meru

Philomena Mwilu

Deputy Chief Justice Philomena Mwilu delivers her remarks during the Council of Governors' luncheon at Movenpick hotel in Nairobi on January 29, 2021.

Photo credit: Diana Ngila | Nation Media Group

What you need to know:

  • Justice Patrick Jeremy Otieno said the suspension will be in place for 11 days, when all parties will be heard at the Meru High Court.

A judge has temporarily lifted orders barring Deputy Chief Justice Philomena Mwilu from occupying her office.

Justice Patrick Jeremy Otieno said the suspension will be in place for 11 days, after which all parties in the matter will be heard at the Meru High Court.

Earlier on Monday, Justice Mwilu filed an urgent application seeking to suspend the decision barring her from occupying her office and discharging her duties as the acting Chief Justice.

In the petition before the High Court in Meru, she further sought orders for the case by lawyer Isaiah Mwongela to be transferred to Nairobi for hearing. 

Justice Otieno on Friday threw the Judiciary into disarray after issuing orders restraining Justice Mwilu from occupying her office and discharging her duties as acting CJ.

The judge further restrained Justice Mwilu from occupying the office of the Judiciary Ombudsman pending the determination of a case filed by one Isaiah Mwongela.

The petitioner says he has evidence that provided sufficient grounds for instituting criminal proceedings against Ms Mwilu, hence her unfitness to continue holding office.

In a sworn affidavit, Mr Mwongela, who hails from Maua, Meru County, says he filed the petition in public interest.

The decision caused confusion as the DCJ, or indeed any other judge, can only be removed from office through a decision by a tribunal appointed by the President to investigate her conduct.