Hello

Your subscription is almost coming to an end. Don’t miss out on the great content on Nation.Africa

Ready to continue your informative journey with us?

Hello

Your premium access has ended, but the best of Nation.Africa is still within reach. Renew now to unlock exclusive stories and in-depth features.

Reclaim your full access. Click below to renew.

Caption for the landscape image:

Gen Z power: Why Parliament is seeking more time to prepare budget

Scroll down to read the article

The National Assembly during a sitting.

Photo credit: File I Nation Media Group

The Budget Policy Statement consideration period by the MPs could be extended by seven days from the current 14 if Parliament approves the proposed changes to the Public Finance Management (PFM) Act.

The Public Finance Management (Amendment) Bill 2022 by Uasin Gishu County Woman Representative Gladys Boss seeks to amend section 25 (7) of the PFM Act to add MPs more time to scrutinise the Budget Policy Statement (BPS), a government document setting broad priority strategies and policies, before subsequently informing and involving Kenyans sufficiently.

The proposed law seeks to implement the resolutions made by the 12th Parliament in its approval of the fifth report of the Procedure and House Rules Committee on the amendments to its Standing Orders.

“The object of this Bill is to amend the PFM Act to increase the period for consideration of the BPS to allow for comprehensive scrutiny of the proposals contained in the statement,” the Bill reads.

The MPs will be considering the proposed changes at a time when youth protesters, mostly of the Generation-Z, influenced public participation on Bills after they stormed Parliament in June 2024 in protest following the passage of the ‘punitive’ Finance Bill, 2024 that would later be rejected.  

The actions by the Gen-Zs saw Clerk of the National Assembly Samuel Njoroge issue a directive that public participation on Bills, specifically Finance Bill, enacted every year, start at the constituency level so as to involve as many people as necessary. 

Section 25 (7) of the PFM Act states that Parliament shall, not later than 14 days after the BPS is submitted (to Parliament), table and discuss a report containing its recommendations and pass a resolution to adopt it with or without amendments.

Its passage mandates the National Treasury Cabinet Secretary an opportunity to take into account resolutions passed by parliament in finalizing the budget for the relevant financial year.

The National Treasury is then required to publish and publicise the BPS not later than 15 days after submission of the statement to parliament.

This paves the way for the National Treasury to prepare and submit to the cabinet for approval, by September 30 in each financial year, a Budget Review and Outlook Paper (BROP).

Brop includes the actual fiscal performance in the previous financial year compared to the budget appropriation for that year.

However, the Bill seeks to compel the National Treasury to adjust the time required to publish and publicise the BPS after submission to Parliament, from 15 days to 22 days.

BPS is a government document prepared by the National Treasury setting broad strategic priorities and policy goals that guide the national and county governments in preparing their budgets for the relevant financial year and over the medium term.

The PFM Act provides that the National Treasury submits BPS to the National Assembly not later than February 15 every financial year, for consideration and approval.

Ms Boss’ proposed amendment is coming after the MPs have never agreed over whether the report of the Budget and Appropriations Committee (BAC) on the BPS or the BPS itself can be amended by Parliament.

For instance, in 2022, the House was debating the 2022 BPS and because of the limited time within which to consider the statement, they complained that they did not have enough time to scrutinise the document and make the required decisions.

The debate on the 2022 BPS would later be postponed by then National Assembly Speaker Justin Muturi ostensibly to pave the way for consultations with the National Treasury on the areas of possible changes.

The need for consultations was triggered after BAC recommended that the expenditure ceiling of the national executive be slashed by Sh400 billion from Sh2.017 trillion as had been proposed in the 2022 BPS document.

The BPS document had projected an expenditure of Sh3.33 trillion for the country in the 2022/23 financial year but with a whooping Sh846 billion deficit, which BAC warned that if passed as then published, would be akin to violating the then Sh9 trillion debt ceiling enacted in November 2018.

In October 2023, amended the PFM Act, replacing the Sh10 trillion public debt numerical ceiling with a debt anchor set at 55 percent of the GDP in present value terms.

The need to slash the government’s expenditure was pegged on the projection by the Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO) that by June 2022, Kenya’s debt stock would hit Sh8.6 trillion, which came to pass.

However, parliament and the National Treasury agreed and the BPS was adopted as originally published but with a rider that the National Treasury submits to the House proposed amendments to the Public Finance Management (National Government) Regulations to expand the country’s debt ceiling.

Parliament would later expand the debt ceiling by Sh400 billion to avoid slashing the executive’s estimates as had been proposed by BAC in its report to the House.

Regulation 205 (5) of the PFM (National Government) Regulations requires the regulations on budget ceiling to be approved by parliament- the National Assembly and Senate.

The law mandates the National Treasury to include in the BPS document an assessment of the current state of the economy and the financial outlook over the medium term, including macro-economic forecasts and the fiscal responsibility principles and financial objectives including limits on total annual debt.

Also required are the proposed expenditure limits for the national government (executive), including those of parliament and the judiciary and indicative transfers to the county governments.

The law says that in preparing the BPS, the National Treasury shall seek and take into account the views of the Commission on Revenue Allocation (CRA), county governments, Controller of Budget (CoB), Parliamentary Service Commission (PSC), Judicial Service Commission (JSC), the public and any other interested persons or groups.