The death of a key witness at the heart of an investigation into the booming fake gold business has raised questions about Kenya’s commitment to dismantle the criminal underworld.
The witness protection system has come under sharp scrutiny following the death of Wycliffe Omwenga as the State desperately tries to rein in notorious dealers in the trade.
Wycliffe was a key witness in the murder of his brother Kelvin, a fake gold scammer, in Kilimani last August. Detectives are still trying to find out the circumstances behind his death in his house at Riruta, Nairobi.
Wycliffe Omwenga who was found dead in his house last week. His family has said that he lived in constant fear in the days leading to his death.
Photo credit: Courtesy
A post-mortem on Tuesday was inconclusive on the cause of death and the pathologist took samples for toxicology tests.
The death comes just four months after Jennifer Wambua, a deputy communications director at the National Land Commission was murdered at Kerarapon in Ngong, Kajiado County.
Like Wycliffe, Wambua was a key witness in a case where Lugari MP Ayub Savula and former Principal Secretary Sammy Itemere have been charged, alongside 16 others, with conspiring to defraud the government of Sh122.3 million.
But even as detectives continue to dig in to unearth the circumstances behind Wycliffe’s demise, legal experts say his death is a huge blow to the State in winning a murder case in which he was a key witness.
Most importantly, however, his death has exposed the laxity by the state in protecting key witnesses, the reason behind the setbacks in many court cases.
Wycliffe was in the sitting room of house number 703 at Galana Suites, Kilimani, on the night his brother Kelvin was murdered inside his bedroom over a suspected gold deal that went sour.
Although it is yet to be established whether Wycliffe died of natural causes, it is puzzling as to why he was not placed under witness protection.
As a key witness in such a high-profile case, he was an eligible candidate for placement in the programme. This was admitted by the chief executive of the Witness Protection Agency, Ms Alice Ondieki.
“There was definitely a threat in Wycliffe’s case. It’s unfortunate but then again, the investigating officer should have been able to assess the level of threat and inform the Director of Public Prosecutions, who would have in turn requested us to protect the witness,” Ms Ondieki told the Nation.
The fake gold scam, which Kelvin had just joined before meeting his death in August last year, is run by a ruthless syndicate that has connections with other gangs globally and within the local criminal justice system.
To date, no gold scammer has been successfully tried and convicted in court. Most of the cases either drag on for too long or those who are conned are threatened with death or arrest for doing business in Kenya without a permit. Frustrated, they withdraw their complaints.
Wycliffe’s family says he felt that he was being followed in the days leading to his death. He had only recently moved to Riruta to lie low as there were people who had threatened him.
According to a statement he gave to the Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI) after his brother’s death, Wycliffe said he was in the sitting room when he heard a loud bang.
In her statement with the police, she said she was just getting to know him over some drinks when he was called to the bedroom to discuss a private matter. She then heard a loud bang.
With Wycliffe gone, the state will largely depend on the remaining witness and circumstantial evidence to get a conviction when the trial starts later this year.
“The only way you can admit a deceased person as evidence is if it was made as a dying declaration,” Mr Charles Mwalimu, a criminal lawyer told the Nation.
“The right to a fair hearing as guaranteed in Article 50 of the Constitution says that the accused person has a right to cross-examine any evidence brought against them,” he added.
Mr Caleb Odhiambo, Mr William Suji, Mr Leonard Adiedo, Mr Patrick Oketch and Mr Festus Ranyondo walked free last year after the prosecution failed to produce one of the people who allegedly saw them killing Samuel Owili at Barshauri location in Siaya County in 2014.
“The prosecution claim an eye witness died. They did not attempt to have the statement of persons who cannot be called as witnesses produced in evidence by the investigating officer,” said Justice Roselyn Aburili in her ruling, which set the five free.
Section 33 of the Evidence Act gives exceptions where evidence given by a person who for some reason cannot be produced in court.
“When the statement is made by a person as to the cause of his death, or as to any of the circumstances of the transaction which resulted in his death, in cases in which the cause of that person’s death comes into question and such statements are admissible,” states the Act.
It, however, contradicts the right to fair hearing as enshrined in the Constitution, which says every bit of evidence must be subjected to cross-examination.
“We don’t turn away anyone but we find a way of protecting the people we feel are in danger. You cannot force a person into the programme as demanded by the Act,” said Ms Ondieki.
