Hello

Your subscription is almost coming to an end. Don’t miss out on the great content on Nation.Africa

Ready to continue your informative journey with us?

Hello

Your premium access has ended, but the best of Nation.Africa is still within reach. Renew now to unlock exclusive stories and in-depth features.

Reclaim your full access. Click below to renew.

Politicians should keep to campaign timelines

A political rally.  

Photo credit: John Njoroge | Nation Media Group

The campaigns for the 2027 General Election have already begun. Highly visible political activity, led by the president and members of his government, described as development tours, shows a nation already knee deep in campaigns.

The youth have also raised the stakes, with the #NikoKadi movement sweeping across the country, urging young people to register as voters in anticipation of the elections. While increased youth registration is welcome, the surrounding atmosphere speaks volumes about intent and direction.

Kenyans have long tolerated early campaigning. The incumbent president campaigned through much of the previous administration, and the pattern appears unchanged. The government is now in full campaign mode as it seeks to secure another term.

Is all this within constitutional provisions? Is the electoral body empowered to restrain early campaigns, and does it have the power to ensure compliance with set timelines?

What is happening risks distracting governance. Although activities are framed as development tours, the messaging is clearly political. Public funds are involved, and it is difficult to argue that they are solely for development. Many citizens view these projects as inducements rather than routine service.

Why not pursue development without excessive fanfare and political overtones? The approach resembles a carrot and stick, focused on vote-rich regions. This contradicts promises of equitable development across Kenya. Development is welcome, but politics should be kept out of it until the right time.

Recent reports of planned engagements between electoral officials and legislators further signal heightened election focus. Though such meetings are procedural, suspicion persists.

Constitutional timelines exist for a reason, and should be respected by all actors to safeguard stability and sustained national development. Ultimately, the responsibility lies with leaders and institutions to prioritise governance over politicking, ensuring that public trust is not eroded and that national resources serve long-term interests rather than short-term electoral gain.

Follow our WhatsApp channel for breaking news updates and more stories like this.