The trouble with Business Daily’s headline on Nyota startups

Mr Mohammed Doyo, the Secretary for MSMEs (Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises), yesterday called out the Business Daily over its splash on the Nyota programme.

The headline: “Nyota startups face collapse with Sh1 billion” must have startled him, and possibly ruined his breakfast—and rightly so. Not only because he is an interested party, given that the programme falls within his docket, but because the headline is outrightly misleading and unfair.

We shall explain how, but let’s first reproduce Mr Doyo’s complaint, posted on LinkedIn.

“Dear Business Daily Africa. Your front page today warrants a serious conversation. This morning, you published the headline: “Nyota startups face collapse with Sh1 billion.” I want to make a clear, evidence-based argument that this headline is not just poorly framed. It breaks foundational rules of responsible journalism.

First, understand what NYOTA (National Youth Opportunities Towards Advancement) Project is. This is a $229 million World Bank-financed Government of Kenya initiative targeting 820,000 unemployed young people, most of whom never progressed beyond Form Four, including women, persons with disabilities, refugees, and youth from marginalised counties. These are not Westlands entrepreneurs. These are Kenya’s most vulnerable youth starting businesses for the very first time.

Now interrogate the 20 percent. Your own story says the government projects roughly 20 percent of 120,000 youth-run businesses may not survive. That is a risk projection embedded in the programme design, not a scandal. It means 80 percent, approximately 96,000 young Kenyans, are expected to succeed. In any honest newsroom, that is the headline.

Harvard Business School research places the global startup failure rate at between 65 and 90 percent within the first five years. A projected 80 percent survival rate for first-time entrepreneurs from marginalised backgrounds is, by every international benchmark, extraordinary. The numbers your headline buried matter: 120,000 youth. Sh50,000 each. That is more than Ksh. 5 billion deployed, not the Sh1 billion your headline suggests.

Here are the journalistic rules broken: The principle of proportionality: “Collapse” belongs to stories of systemic failure, not a routine risk projection; The obligation of headline accuracy: Your own article does not say NYOTA is failing, but your headline does; The duty to provide context: A 20 percent projection means nothing without benchmarking it against global norms; The principle of minimising harm: This headline discourages eligible youth from applying and poisons a policy conversation with evidence the story itself does not support; The distinction between fact and inference: These businesses have not collapsed. A forecast is not a fact. 120,000 young Kenyans trying to build something from nothing deserved better framing. So did your readers.”

Trouble with the headline

Ironically, the story is based on information attributed to MSME Principal Secretary Susan Mang’eni, and its facts are not disputable.

She revealed the government’s projection that about 20 per cent of the targeted 120,000 youth-run businesses would not survive. With Sh5.28 billion set aside for these businesses, the 20 per cent would translate to a loss of Sh1 billion.

The story’s writer proceeds to discuss a previous similar initiative, the Kenya Youth Employment and Opportunities Project (KYEOP), which ended in 2024. Nyota’s projected failure rate of 20 per cent pales in comparison to the KYEOP, where auditors could not even reach more than half of the beneficiaries.

The trouble with the Nyota story is the headline, which gave it a totally different meaning. Read alone, it gives the impression that all the Nyota businesses face collapse.

No wonder Mr Doyo stresses that the projection of a 20 per cent failure rate is a risk embedded in the programme planning, not a scandal.

One has to read the kicker (wording below the headline) to know that the “collapse” refers to 20 per cent of the startups, and that the Sh1 billion is a fifth of the planned allocation. The headline is not just a case of poor or negative framing. It is misleading to the reader.

A headline serves as a window into the story, summarising up to 2,000 words in a short phrase. In this era where people are too busy to read entire stories, many readers skim through the newspaper, reading the headlines and looking at the photographs.

Headline writing is a key skill taught to editors in journalism school and perfected with experience. The first rule is that a headline must be accurate. A professional editor reads the full story to understand it before giving it a headline. Once the headline is written, the editor must step back and ask: Does it represent the story?

This brings us to Mr Doyo’s complaint about the lack of context. He notes that reporting a 20 per cent failure without benchmarking with global rates means nothing.

We agree. As a reputable business publication, the Business Daily can do better than this. Its readers expect analysis and context to frame stories. In fact, going by the discussion of Nyota’s predecessor, KYEOP, a projection of a 20 per cent failure rate is ambitious, and the Business Daily should have said so. If, as Mr Doyo says, the global startup failure rate is between 65 and 90 per cent within the first five years, then the PS should have been challenged to give reasons for her confidence that the Kenyan programme would perform better.

The framing of the headline is an important point for discussion, too. Is a projected failure rate of 20 percent in Kenya’s prevailing business environment a matter of concern, or a routine risk projection expected during programme planning? What is the “so what?” of this story? Why did it warrant not just Page One treatment, but also the prime slot on the cover?

Would the headline writer dismiss Mr Doyo’s complaints as a case of seeing a ‘half-full or half-empty glass’, where he or she chose the negative spin over the positive? It would have been—only if the headline was accurate. It was not.

Follow our WhatsApp channel for breaking news updates and more stories like this.

Contact the Public Editor to raise ethical concerns or request a review of published material. Reach out: Email: [email protected]. Mobile number: 0741978786.