Individuals affected by noise pollution can seek legal recourse.
Dear Wakili,
I live in a friendly neighbourhood with homeowners, but lately, my immediate neighbour has been hosting loud parties. I have brought this to their attention, explaining that the noise is excessive and disrupts our peace at home. Unfortunately, nothing has changed, and with the festivities around the corner, I can imagine it will only get worse. Can I sue my neighbour for noise pollution?
Dear Distressed Neighbour,
In this country, every person has the constitutional right to sue and be sued, particularly when the offence affects fundamental rights or freedoms outlined in the Bill of Rights under Chapter Four of the Kenyan Constitution.
Article 22, Clause 1, guarantees citizens and residents the non-derogable right to petition the court regarding any matter that interferes with or harms their well-being.
Article 31 grants the right to privacy, which means that a person's actions within their private space should not concern anyone outside of it. However, if those actions cause disturbance, nuisance, or discomfort to others outside the private space, Article 24 of the Constitution, Clause 1, paragraph (d) can be invoked to address the offence.
This provision limits certain rights, especially when one person's enjoyment of those rights negatively impacts the rights of others. The exercise of any right must not offend or harm another individual. Any law that restricts the enjoyment of rights or freedoms must be reasonable and justifiable, promoting human dignity, equality, and freedom. These considerations are essential when initiating court proceedings.
Noise arises from human activity and can significantly impact residential areas. It triggers various environmental laws, policies, and regulations designed to balance privacy rights with the freedoms of others who share the common good. Article 42 of the Constitution emphasises the shared responsibility to maintain a clean and healthy environment, while Article 43 addresses claims related to housing adequacy and accessibility. Thus, noise interferes with people's ability to access the benefits and privileges associated with the common good.
Control of noise pollution is as important as that of air, water and environmental pollution.
Individuals affected by environmental degradation can seek legal recourse based on their rights as outlined in Article 70. This principle was thoroughly examined by Justice Christopher Nzili in the case of Ekutan & 6 others v. Jasto Mwiti, also known as “Sizzler,” identified as Case E001 of 2025 at the Kitale Environment and Land Court.
Under the Environmental Management and Coordination Act (EMCA) and the Pollution Control Regulation of 2009, particularly Regulation 3(1), noise is defined as any undesirable sound that is objectionable or could have adverse effects on human health or the environment. These legal frameworks establish a general prohibition against producing or causing loud, unreasonable, unnecessary, or unusual noise that annoys, disturbs, injures, or endangers the comfort, peace, health, or safety of others and the environment.
Regulation 3(2) outlines specific factors to consider when addressing noise complaints. These factors include the time of day, proximity to residential areas, whether the noise is recurrent, intermittent, or constant, its level and intensity, and whether the noise is amplified by electronic or mechanical means. Additionally, it's necessary to determine if the noise can be controlled without significant effort or expense by the person responsible for creating it.
Since the Constitution empowers counties to control pollution, it is advisable to first address the issue directly with the neighbour regarding the noise coming from their property. If that does not resolve the issue, the next step is to report the problem to the local office of the National Environment and Management Authority (Nema) and to the County Executive Committee responsible for environmental matters. If these agencies fail to take satisfactory action, the affected individual, or someone acting on their behalf, can then file a petition in Court.
Kenyans work under a lot of noise from campaign teams.
When the Court convenes to hear the case, it will first determine whether all relevant administrative remedies have been exhausted. After establishing a prima facie case based on the allegations, the Court will seek scientific confirmation regarding the noise claims, as outlined in Regulations 5 and 6 of the Pollution Control Regulations. This step will help ascertain whether the noise was necessary for the preservation of life, health, safety, or property.
Engaging expert agencies like Nema is essential in this process. Adherence to evidence requirements, exhaustion of administrative conflict resolution mechanisms, and compliance with the Evidence Act will guide the Judge in making an informed decision.
Follow our WhatsApp channel for breaking news updates and more stories like this.
