Premium
How faith and modern medicine can co-exist
Prophet David Owuor of the Ministry of Repentance and Holiness during a past crusade in Nairobi’s Central Park.
What you need to know:
- in times of sickness, and especially serious illness, the relationship between faith and medicine can become tense.
- Too often, the conversation about faith and medicine has been framed as a choice between belief and evidence.
In Kenya, like in many places around the world, faith and medicine both play powerful roles in people’s lives. On the one hand is faith, a source of meaning, hope, community and spiritual comfort. On the other is modern medicine, a source of diagnosis, treatment and a scientific pathway to healing.
Both are deeply important. Yet in times of sickness, and especially serious illness, the relationship between faith and medicine can become tense, confused or adversarial.
Too often, the conversation about faith and medicine has been framed as a choice between belief and evidence: either trust in doctors and science, or trust in God. This is a false dichotomy. The discourse should not be about opposing one to the other, but rather should focus on how they can complement each other, and where they must respect boundaries that protect lives.
What is different today is that the ability of medical science to prevent and treat disease has grown exponentially, even as the spiritual questions of meaning, suffering and hope have remained deeply human and deeply spiritual.
The conflict between faith and medicine generally emerges only when spiritual assertions about healing are made that cannot be supported by science. We have seen this in claims of miraculous healing and in the rejection of medical advice in favour of spiritual ‘intervention’ alone. For a diabetic who discontinues insulin after being told they are healed, the results can be fatal. For a person with a treatable infection who refuses antibiotics in the name of faith, the result can be a life-threatening illness. These are not hypothetical cases; these are scenarios experienced by families and clinicians daily.
Ingredients of good healthcare
Faith communities rightly focus on prayer, testimony, healing services and spiritual fortitude. This is not problematic per se. But when it is offered instead of evidence-based medical care, especially in acute or life-threatening conditions, the result can be a delayed diagnosis, preventable complications or death. Medicine works; diseases have biological causes; treatments have been studied, measured and honed. To turn one’s back on this has grave consequences.
Faith and medicine are not natural enemies. In many cases, they can positively propel one another. For instance, it is well understood that illness is more than a physical condition. It is an emotional, social and psychological experience. Suffering an illness, particularly a serious diagnosis, can be a profoundly isolating and frightening experience.
Faith communities are a source of belonging, prayerful support, counselling, and a sense of purpose and meaning, which positively impacts mental health and can, in turn, have a positive effect on physical recovery. Social support and positive mental health have been shown in numerous studies to be directly correlated with positive outcomes in managing chronic illnesses.
Likewise, many of our most compassionate and committed nurses, doctors, counsellors, and community health workers are people of faith. Their spiritual values and beliefs drive their care for others and help them to do so with deep compassion and a sense of human dignity.
Faith traditions can inspire a call to service, altruism and commitment to the sick. These are all important ingredients of good healthcare. Faith and medicine both care about human flourishing; they simply use different languages and approaches to express it. When we recognise this, we open the space to partnership instead of competition.
Practical ways to build bridges
Faith does not trump medicine; it simply uses different tools. Rejecting the evidence of science is not spiritual heroism; it’s playing with fire. The claims that one needs no medical care, in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, should be challenged with discernment. Faith leaders should not reinforce stories that lead families away from appropriate care. Spiritual language does not have to contradict medical recommendations.
Faith communities can offer support for follow-up appointments, medications, healthy lifestyles and the hard emotional work that accompanies accepting a chronic illness. Spiritual care includes helping families understand systems, manage uncertainty and hold on to hope. All of this can happen without compromising evidence-based care.
Hospitals and faith institutions can open respectful conversations, so that clinicians understand spiritual perspectives and faith leaders understand medical realities. This reduces misunderstandings and builds trust.
As clinicians, we have an obligation to provide health education in a way that is respectful of people’s beliefs and, where possible, to explain why treatments work. Clinicians should also create space to ask patients about their spiritual beliefs. Faith leaders can create opportunities for congregants to ask questions about their medical conditions and treatments, and to seek second opinions if needed. Shared decision-making is one way to honour both the heart and the body.
Medicine helps with diagnosis, treatment and disease prevention, while faith provides hope through meaning, community and prayer. When we hold both with humility and respect, we give our friends, families and communities the greatest chance not only to survive, but to flourish.
Dr Bosire is a medical doctor and lawyer. [email protected]
